Yesterday, I reviewed Why We Read What We Read by Lisa Adams and John Heath which I read as part of the Dewey Decimal challenge. I enjoyed the book quite a bit and consider it to be a very lucky find on my part. The authors graciously agreed to do an interview for Ready When You Are, C.B. and turned out to be as much fun "in person" as they are in print. Here's the interview:I usually don't ask this but what was the inspiration for Why We Read What We Read? Were you regular readers of best sellers before you started this project? Did you discover any authors you intend to keep reading?
We’re pretty big book nerds. While hunting for a book we could write together, we realized we were both fascinated by the bestseller lists (which we knew little about) and would enjoy writing snarky reviews of popular titles. Voila! While we haven’t followed the lists as intensely as we did while researching our book, we definitely keep an eye on them. We discovered several authors whose work we plan to keep reading, such as David McCullough, Malcolm Gladwell, Eric Schlosser, Jonathan Franzen, Joyce Carol Oates, Andre Dubus III, and Audrey Niffenegger.

I tried to find out if the two of you are married via Google. (They say everything can be googled these days.) I found only one source that answered this question; it said yes. I hope it was correct because I'm going to plunge in and ask this question. What can you tell us about working as a married team? How do you divide the job? Do you think your experience would make you good guests on the Dr. Phil show?
We have been hitched in spirit for some time, though we are actually getting legally married in three weeks! While we have written books alone and co-written books with others, this was actually our first book together. It was a wonderful experience (and we’re not just saying that to avoid getting the silent treatment). One of the most enjoyable parts about it was that we could write with the other in mind, adding in phrases and jokes that we knew the other would love. We motivated each other to keep writing; we cheered each other up when we felt overwhelmed. It all worked because we were committed to the same vision of our book and could both write in the same style. That’s not to say we didn’t have any frustrations, but overall the experience was extremely positive, and we definitely plan to do it again.
In general, Lisa read and wrote about the fiction books, and John read and wrote about the nonfiction books—though in some cases we swapped or both read the same book. After writing a portion of the book, each of us would have the other read and edit that section. Then we worked on weaving the various sections together to make cohesive chapters.
As for Dr. Phil—the answer is yes, we would make great guests on any talk show! (wink wink)
In your chapter on relationship advice books you sum them up as all having the same basic characteristics: "a preference for celebrity authorities; simple analysis of problems; quick and relatively easy, comfortable fixes; and an appeal to our deepest preconceptions and fears" which I think also applies to the diet and exercise books and possibly to the books on religion and spirituality. I recently attended an inservice, I teach middle school in the North Bay, and found what the two presenters were saying fit this description almost to a "t". This did not exactly inspire hope for improving education any time soon, but it did give me a critical framework to work from when evaluating their presentation. What do you hope readers take away from your analysis of self-help and relationship books? Were you concerned that your readers might end up thinking they should simply "trust no one"?
Ultimately we hoped that people would understand the ways that many self-help, inspiration, relationship, and diet books keep readers in the same vicious cycle, providing temporary comfort without actually solving problems. While self-help books can truly be helpful and inspiring, reading alone is far from enough: it takes significant action on the reader’s part to make genuine, long-term change.
Yours is the best, most enlightening, evaluation of Oprah's Book Club that I have read to date. I was surprised to hear you say that there really isn't an "Oprah Book" since it's a term that is used so often and everyone seems to have agreed on what it means. With that in mind, do you have a favorite Oprah book? I imagine there are people out there who mainly read the books she recommends. What do think of the experience her regular readers are having?
We were surprised by the overall high quality that we found on Oprah’s list. Before reading any of the books, we had understood them to be maudlin and poorly written—most people we knew (snobs, it’s true) referred derisively to “Oprah books.” And while we did find some of her selections to be the weepy tomes we originally expected, we were generally pretty impressed. Oprah’s choices tend to be the best on the bestseller lists—so her regular readers could do much worse. Our personal favorites are House of Sand and Fog by Andre Dubus III and The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen.
In chapter 5, "Soul Train: Religion and Spirituality" you hit two nails on the head as far as I am concerned. One, that the readers of religious writing must trust that the writer is correct since there is no way to prove anything he or she says. This is true even when the writer is interpreting scriptures. And two, that trusting the word of someone who interprets the Bible without the ability to read it in it's original language is like trusting a Shakespeare scholar who cannot read English. In light of that what do you think of the growing political power of people like Rick Warren who recently used his interpretation of the Bible to help pass California's Proposition 8 which discriminates against lesbian and gay people? (In fairness I should tell you that my marriage is one of those that will be ended if Ken Starr has his way in court.) Have you come across any books on religion or spirituality that sincerely deepened your understanding of either?
While we are not religious people, we are fairly interested in and educated about religion—so it is fair to say that we were pretty appalled by much of the bestselling religious writing we reviewed. Fans of Rick Warren we are not, and the fact that he and other bestselling authors of his ilk have any political power is both alarming and mind-boggling.
However, we did truly enjoy exploring the spiritual/religious genre. This was the area of the bestseller lists with which we were least familiar; and in reading these books, we discovered a whole fascinating world of arguments and sniping that we never knew existed. Delving into the ongoing battle between the fundamentalist Christian and New Age viewpoints opened our eyes and taught us a lot about American readers.
I want to ask at least one question about the Left Behind series, of which you both read all 5000 plus pages, but I don't think I can without being overly snarky. Have you seen any of the movie versions? Which do you think are better, the books or the movies?
We considered watching the first movie, but honestly—we like to keep our memories of Kirk Cameron safely in the Growing Pains years where they belong! It would be hard to imagine the movie being worse than the book…but somehow we think it probably is.
Much has been written lately about the decline of the printed book review and the rise of the web review. Have you been following the book blog scene? Do you think it will eventually have an effect on the best seller lists?
Perhaps the greatest irony in the two of us writing Why We Read What We Read is that we rarely read book reviews! We’re kind of anal people who prefer to let a book unfold on its own rather than read too much about it prematurely. That said, we’re certain that online book reviews will continue to grow in readership. The truly talented reviewers will find an audience, whether their work is digital or printed. Personally, we think it’s a good thing that the field is expanding. We have experienced how a printed review can make or break a book—from both sides—and it’s a little alarming how much power a few people can have.
Lisa, I did spent some time reviewing your website,
http://www.lisaadamswriting.com/ and came away from it admiring you as a sort of writer/gun-for-hire. You write press releases, brochures, fiction, non-fiction, web site content, technical manuals, just about everything one can name; offer a full range of editing and proofreading services; and even offer on-line courses in writing and grammar. It seems like a heck-of-a-way to make a living. Is this typical for writers these days? How did you become a writer? How do you like it? Have you any advice for people looking to make money writing?
Business writing is definitely a way for any talented writer to make a good living these days. In college I majored in English with a writing emphasis and, after graduating, got a job as a marketing writer with a media production agency. From there, I launched my own consulting business. As you can tell, I enjoy variety!
I don’t think there’s any one “typical” path for writers. Sadly, very few make a living writing books alone, but it’s certainly possible to support oneself by writing for companies, advertising agencies, and PR firms. Excellent writers are always in demand!
Because I regularly feature posts about my dog, a Basset named Dakota who likes to eat my books, I like to end each interview by asking if you have any pets and if they have ever gone after your books? If so, do they prefer best sellers?
Yes, we love our pets! We have a two-year-old black lab/border collie mix named Lu (short for Emmylou) and a chubby black cat named Vetta (short for Svetlana). Lu is pretty good as far as dogs go, but she did—in a rare burst of ferocity—destroy our copy of A Brief History of Time. If you’re interested in the heinous details, Lisa actually wrote an article about the event.
I'd like to thank Lisa Adams and John Adams for participating in this little project. And I like to wish them the best of luck and congratulations on their upcoming wedding.